In part two of two, the panel discusses more of the recent accusations against Pr. John MacArthur, this time involving financial impropriety and plagiarism. Is this just a case of slander by a female reporter who has a grudge against strong male leaders or is the evidence presented against Pr. MacArthur credible? Join us Wednesday at 8:30PM, CST as we discuss the charges and how Christians should process accusations against their own heroes of the faith.
// Panelist
– Pr. James
– Abby
– Vicki
RESOURCES:
– https://julieroys.com/masters-university-seminary-tmus-withdraws-ecfa/
– https://julieroys.com/megachurch-mega-mansion-pastor-homes-parsonage-millions/
– https://julieroys.com/johnson-defense-macarthur-more-red-flags/
– https://julieroys.com/sec-charges-son-of-john-macarthur-grace-to-you-board-member-with-fraud/
– https://julieroys.com/john-macarthur-accused-plagiarism-former-vp-masters-seminary/
– https://julieroys.com/harper-collins-apologizes-macarthur-plagiarism-controversy/
– https://julieroys.com/macarthurs-story-martin-luther-king-assassination-true/
// Listen to all the previous Round Table Discussions
https://forsuchatimeasthis.today/roundtable
—
// Visit our website for more content!
// Join the $0.99 monthly club for exclusive content!
FOLLOW US:
Facebook – https://forsuchatimeasthis.today/facebook
Twitter – https://forsuchatimeasthis.today/twitter
Instagram – https://forsuchatimeasthis.today/instagram
Parler – https://forsuchatimeasthis.today/parler
Yes it is
Yes it is
Consider this sermon. https://youtu.be/9sT4bBK-xSo
Is his take pastors should not be paid?
Consider this sermon. https://youtu.be/9sT4bBK-xSo
Is his take pastors should not be paid?
MacArrhur is a money digger. A misogynist, and. “Christian Nationalist”.
Not sure we can go that far. What is a “Christian Nationalist?”
@For Such a Time As This you should know by now
@For Such a Time As This and. I’m sure he’s being paid by someone.
@For Such a Time As This he’s an “influencer who’s being “influenced”. And not in a good way. He preaches half-truths.
How do you have a serious biblical discussion analyzing the validity and christ-worthiness of the actions of a Preacher that starts off with a review of relevant Bible passages, in order to review what the word of God says about an issue, and then when troubling topics arise and are presented to you, your response is a very subjective “I don’t have a problem with that”? His actions are not deemed sinful or righteous based on whether or not you think it’s fine for whatever gut feeling you have. The tone of this broadcast seems very inconsistent when you start off saying that we need to look at the word of God and then you judge his actions based on whether or not you’re cool with it.
I don’t understand you logic. Are you saying we did not make decisions based on the Word? You don’t have a problem with the issues we discussed?
@For Such a Time As This in saying that if you are going to offer criticism or defense of the actions of a Christian, you have to be consistent. You present some as biblically based, and others as a matter of personal preference. You may have made your determination from scripture. But the way you responded when your guests brought up several concerns was to immediately reply “I don’t have a problem with that”. Opinions are fine. But unless your response includes scriptural references, it’s just one guy’s opinion. I’m not judging you as being biased or wrong. But your presentation of criticism was inconsistent.
Are you talking about the COVID accusations?
How do you have a serious biblical discussion analyzing the validity and christ-worthiness of the actions of a Preacher that starts off with a review of relevant Bible passages, in order to review what the word of God says about an issue, and then when troubling topics arise and are presented to you, your response is a very subjective “I don’t have a problem with that”? His actions are not deemed sinful or righteous based on whether or not you think it’s fine for whatever gut feeling you have. The tone of this broadcast seems very inconsistent when you start off saying that we need to look at the word of God and then you judge his actions based on whether or not you’re cool with it.
@For Such a Time As This in saying that if you are going to offer criticism or defense of the actions of a Christian, you have to be consistent. You present some as biblically based, and others as a matter of personal preference. You may have made your determination from scripture. But the way you responded when your guests brought up several concerns was to immediately reply “I don’t have a problem with that”. Opinions are fine. But unless your response includes scriptural references, it’s just one guy’s opinion. I’m not judging you as being biased or wrong. But your presentation of criticism was inconsistent.
How do you have a serious biblical discussion analyzing the validity and christ-worthiness of the actions of a Preacher that starts off with a review of relevant Bible passages, in order to review what the word of God says about an issue, and then when troubling topics arise and are presented to you, your response is a very subjective “I don’t have a problem with that”? His actions are not deemed sinful or righteous based on whether or not you think it’s fine for whatever gut feeling you have. The tone of this broadcast seems very inconsistent when you start off saying that we need to look at the word of God and then you judge his actions based on whether or not you’re cool with it.
I don’t understand you logic. Are you saying we did not make decisions based on the Word? You don’t have a problem with the issues we discussed?
@@ForSuchaTimeAsThisToday in saying that if you are going to offer criticism or defense of the actions of a Christian, you have to be consistent. You present some as biblically based, and others as a matter of personal preference. You may have made your determination from scripture. But the way you responded when your guests brought up several concerns was to immediately reply “I don’t have a problem with that”. Opinions are fine. But unless your response includes scriptural references, it’s just one guy’s opinion. I’m not judging you as being biased or wrong. But your presentation of criticism was inconsistent.
Are you talking about the COVID accusations?